The University aspires to create a “living laboratory” in which the campus grounds are not only a backdrop of campus life, but an integral component of teaching, research, and outreach. The concept of a living laboratory is described in the Twin Cities Campus Master Plan and the Systemwide Sustainability Goals and Outcomes Report. As a living laboratory the campus grounds will be a medium for innovation, testing, demonstration, and learning.
The Twin Cities Sustainability Committee has developed a pilot process to facilitate identification and implementation of living laboratory projects. The Committee invites proposals from the University community to utilize campus grounds as a living laboratory. Selected proposals will be provided space on the campus grounds and assistance facilitating project implementation. Funding to implement the proposal is not provided through this process and must be arranged separately. The proposal process is summarized below and detailed online at Living Lab Process.
Thanks to all those who submitted proposals! Proposals are currently being reviewed. Proposal awards will be announced April 22.
A map of areas of campus eligible for living lab projects is available here. In addition, a list of University maintenance and improvement projects planned for grounds is available at Landcare Projects. Proposers are encouraged to align their submissions with existing project plans if possible.
Proposals are invited from the campus community twice per year. The next call for proposals will be announced Fall 2013
Proposals will be evaluated by the Living Lab Review Panel. The Panel will evaluate proposals relative to the following criteria:
• Support of University mission. How does the project further the University’s core mission of teaching, research, and outreach?
• Stewardship of the University and the University Community. Multiple considerations including:
• Impact of the project on other uses of the space.
• Opportunity to integrate project into current or planned campus operations.
• Opportunity for replication or large-scale development of the project.
• Compliance with applicable codes and statutes.
• Alignment with Sustainability Goals.
• Does the project advance University sustainability goals defined in the Regents policy, related University plans (e.g. Systemwide Goals and Outcomes Report), and external commitments (e.g. American College and University Presidents’ Climate Commitment)?
• Does the proposal contribute to regional sustainability? (e.g. improving watershed)
• Academic Alignment. Projects must be affiliated with a University department.
• Financial Plan. Is the budget thoughtfully prepared and reasonable given the scope of work proposed? Have potential financial resources been identified and/or committed to pay for implementation, maintenance, and removal/restoration of the space (if applicable) of the project? (Note: Projects do not need to secure financial resources prior to submission.)
• Other Factors
• Does the project have a high likelihood of success given the scope, schedule, and budget proposed?
• Does the proposal improve on and/or measure the efficacy of existing infrastructure?
Proposals selected by the Panel will be recommended for implementation, provided space on campus to implement their project, and given assistance facilitating project implementation. Proposed projects may require additional review after the Panel’s evaluation to ensure safety, compliance with codes and/or University policy, availability of funding, etc.
• 2012 - AASHE STARS Silver Rating
• 2012 - TCF Bank Stadium named Best Public Rain Garden by Metro Blooms
AASHE is helping to create a brighter future of opportunity for all by advancing sustainability in higher education. For more information visit AASHE.